Bibliographies are commonly known as a list of: books, sources and articles– typically used to cite sources. Though, scholarly, there has been a shift regarding what is a Bibliography– challenging our preconceived notions and prejudices regarding the materialistic content of what constitutes a Bibliography; a Bibliography is not merely a works cited but material with intellectual depth– not with discourse but with the actual content characterization. A Bibliography is not a superficial list of works but examines the cultural value of texts, books and digital forms of literature. There are different aspects that should be considered when scrutinizing a Bibliography– the social-cultural framework surrounding the period in which book/ content was produced. In this instance, physical elements should be considered– the type of paper that was used/ produced, watermarks and the mechanism used to reproduce and spread literature; in this manner, converging material characteristics with our social-cultural time period and values– all dependent on our surroundings. This further demonstrates the fix set of objects in a culture that constantly shifts its values– acting in a feedback loop. And, unlike other branches in the department of arts and humanities were certain objects and materials are reserved for a particular demographic, bibliographies are entrenched in our society: scholars, professors, students, book collectors and libraries are all filled with Bibliographies– providing a sense of community and unity rather than alienating individuals that value academic curiosity and intelligence.
Maruca and Ozment’s position regarding Bibliographies converge material books with critical theory– the liberation of ideas that constrains society from ideology– ideology rooted in behaviors and rituals rather than merely ideas according to Althusser’s standards. The framing of critical theory intervenes against dire social prejudices– one that is intrinsically interconnected to the Bibliography– demonstrating how books are a symbol of power and resistance– echoing topics viewed in books such as 1984 and Brave New World.
Great to see you fleshing out the readings and understanding their importance. You are right to note: ‘Bibliographies– providing a sense of community and unity rather than alienating individuals that value academic curiosity and intelligence.” This is an astute way of thinking about the bibliography, but it is true and vital. I want to start here in conversation!
Hi Josue! The part of your post that really struck me was when when you referred to Bibliographies as presenting a sense of community and unity. But what does that community look like? Who has access to that community? How does it create community and unity? Is it through a shared experience of learning? Or is it something else? Does this idea change from place to place, or is it universal? These are all questions I present to you, myself, and the rest of the class, because I feel as though it could be an interesting rabbit hole to explore.