Moby Dick and the Physical Codex: A Biography of the 1979 Arion Press Edition

The classic novel, Moby Dick, a fundamental and influential work in the American literary canon, has been read and reread for decades, serving as a staple in classrooms across the country. However, you wouldn’t guess that the now essential “must-read” novel was originally a failure. In the year of its publication, 1851, Melville was faced with immense criticism, claiming that his novel was careless, confusing, and overly complex. It wasn’t until the early 20th century that this novel found its revival and became what we know it to be today, showcasing that it needed a different cultural moment, new scholars, and a whole new generation to rediscover this work and appreciate its experimental, modernist, and depthful style. This novel was then adapted into films and limited editions, expanding its audience reach and cultural influence. It is to be said that almost every adult has heard of Moby Dick, whether they even read the story or not. This reveals how a once-failed novel has gained exceptional power and value, all while influencing so many people across many different eras of our American History. In this scholarly essay, I will be honing in on the biography of the 1979 Arion Press publication of Moby Dick by Herman Melville and how it reveals a great deal about ownership, the construction of a book’s value, the history of limited editions, and how even in the digital age we are living it today, people still continue to appreciate physical codicies.

The once-failed novel Moby Dick became an incredibly notable moment in a man’s fine press publishing career, putting him on the map for fine press books in America. This man is Andrew Hoyem, founder of Arion Press, and publisher of a profound limited edition of Moby Dick by Herman Melville in 1997. Yet there was an important time span between the publication of Moby Dick in 1851 and the release of its famous limited edition that needed to occur. As seen in the article regarding the history of Moby Dick by John Bryant Leviathan, “Today, Moby-Dick is regarded as one of our culture’s most powerful books. But this was not always the case, for its readership, now worldwide, had dwindled almost at the moment of its publication in October 1851. And it is safe to say now, 150 years later, that in only the latter half of those years in existence has the novel achieved the readership Melville (himself long gone) might have hoped for and the popularity it deserves. Of course, the power of a book and its popularity are separate things” (Leviathan, 37). This passage is representative of the large gap of time between the publication of Moby Dick and its success. When society accepted it as a powerful piece of literature, it was decades after its release. This highlights how texts will arrive before readers are ready for them, and whether a book finds popularity is a separate idea, unrelated to the power it holds. When Moby Dick was born, it seemed to have died that very day, faced with critique and backlash. It took a different cultural moment to resurrect the content of Moby Dick and place it on the pedestal it sits on today comfortably, as one of the most profound pieces of literature ever written. This argues that a book’s power is separate from its popularity, and that literary power should not be based on immediate praise. Moby Dick found its power not as a popular novel but as a rediscovered one shunned in its time, and praised today. 

The partnership between the resurrection of this canon novel and the adaptation and expansion it underwent supported its launch into the role it plays in our society today as an incredibly recognizable and familiar text, part of pop culture. John Bryant Leviathan continues, “But if a ‘loose-fish’ as vital as Moby-Dick is to last, it will evolve, not simply in the way we interpret it, but in its very materiality, and in the way we ‘package’ it. Readers have a way of turning a text into the thing they want it to be, and to make it look like a reflection of themselves. Thus, Moby-Dick has appeared in special limited editions, abridged editions, children’s editions, translations, recordings, and films” (Leviathan, 37-56). This quote emphasizes how books are not only constructed but also reshaped by culture and society. Great works of literature never remain stagnant, but constantly evolve to fit in the current culture. This explains the various covers books will wear and the different materiality texts will find themselves in. The metaphor used in this quote, “a loose fish’ illustrates that once a text is released into the world, it is subject to transformation and adaptation from the original packaging it first came in, signifying that objects are shaped by society’s needs, and will change as generations go on. This evolution is crucial for a text’s survival in culture, demonstrating that these artifacts stay relevant in collaboration with the new forms they take, not despite it.

There have been many popular limited editions of Moby Dick, rediscovered and reimagined, presenting a new materiality and packaging for the tale we all know and love. The 1979 Arion Press publication of Moby Dick stands out as a gorgeous and powerful edition that catches the eye of anyone near it. From the cover to the spine, every design choice was purposefully crafted to represent the content inside. The blue glossy texture is similar to the blue ocean with a water-like texture, comparable to waves that would have washed over the Pequod. Down the spine, the engraving: “Melville’s Moby Dick Arion Press” is made with silver lettering, smooth yet rigid to the touch. Exploring this publication takes you on an adventure, each art piece and arrangement constructing a new way of thinking of Moby Dick. After a few moments of appreciating the artistry, the cover opens to the first page, containing a simple white blank page, representing the vast and mighty whiteness of the whale. Its large-scale and heavy-duty body sets this work apart as majestic, different, and even an object of desire, much like how the whale is an object of Ahab’s desire.

To take your adventure one step forward into the content of this codex, you must flip through five thick blank white pages before reaching the title page, which features a woodcut-stamped portrait of Herman Melville, his name, and the title printed in blue: Moby Dick; or, The Whale and The Arion Press: San Francisco, 1979. It replicates the quote found in the original copy,  “In token of my admiration for his genius, this book is inscribed to Nathaniel Hawthorne,” Melville’s pen pal for two years. Turning the next few pages, labeled iv–vii, you find the table of contents in Roman type, followed by an illustration of the world map marking major whaling grounds and the inferred track of the Pequod. Feeling the paper, it’s thick and textured, revealing slight lines and traces of acidity. The pages are torn, serrated, and raw, suggesting that the entire sheet was used and intentionally left untrimmed. After hunting and searching under the light, there is a whale-shaped watermark, its hidden nature adding to the storytelling of the whale. After much anticipation and suspense, the opening line of this great American novel has finally arrived, where the first word of the sentence appears large, blue, and bigger than life. Symbolizing the vast blue ocean and suggesting that, just as one can lose themselves at sea, one can also become immersed in the words on the page. 

From cover to cover, it becomes clear that Arion Press maintains significant creative influence over the typography, paper, binding, and illustrations that shape this codex. On their website, they note that “Arion Press pairs great artists with great literature to create beautiful books by hand. Crafting artist books by hand for a half century.” The language used, such as “crafting” and “by hand,” defines this book as the product of human craftsmanship rather than industrial machinery, giving this codex a sense of higher quality and rendering it a one-of-a-kind artifact. The idea of crafting a codex by hand, with the assistance of hand tools, makes this limited edition Arion Press publication of Moby Dick unique, thanks to the personal emotional connection and contact. This choice to handcraft books also responds to the Industrial Revolution, celebrating craftsmanship and the human touch. Since these codices are created by hand, it is stated that every inch of them was a choice and a process led by humans rather than machines. Even the art was made by a human hand, artfully crafted and thoughtfully added to each page.

The beautiful images, produced by Barry Moser, created from relief printing, are scattered on the pages, creating an undeniably eye-catching experience. According to Andrew Hoyem, these illustrations were created intentionally to maintain the interpretation of Moby Dick intact. This is made clear in the following extended passage from the review of Moby Dick by Lewis Carroll. “As far as Moby-Dick is concerned, from the beginning, it was decided by Andrew Hoyem that nothing interpretive would enter into the illustrations. Consequently, they are made up of pictures of whales, ships, and the tools used in whaling, and are based on prints and paintings preserved in those shrines of the whaler to be found in such places as Nantucket, Mystic, and New Bedford. The result is a series of realistic woodcuts, a trifle heavy in their contrasting black-and-white patterns, providing a suitable accompaniment to the hand-set Goudy Modern typeface of the text” (Carroll, Volume 38, Issue 2). The wording in this passage, particularly the phrase, “It was decided by Andrew Hoyem,” highlights the deliberate and authoritative role of the publisher in shaping the visual identity of the edition. By emphasizing Hoyem’s decision that “nothing interpretive” enter the illustrations, the passage frames the artwork not as creative reinterpretation but as an extension of his editorial vision. The repeated focus on historically grounded imagery, “pictures of whales, ships, and the tools used in whaling” reinforces this commitment to authenticity and historical accuracy. Being mindful of this is particularly important when crafting an edition of a book that was already written; you want to carefully stay true to its content to ensure the experience and perception for its readers. Art and illustrations are powerful and influential, especially in the context of a narrative, and can induce an altered interpretation if constructed incorrectly. The fact that the press decided to wholly include illustrations of whales and whaling instead of attempting to tell its story stays true to Melville’s vision and sets them apart as respectful visionaries, careful not to overstep important boundaries

Every choice made while assembling this Limited Edition fine press codex took deep thought and consideration. Each word is printed on custom-made Barcham Green handmade paper, and the font is an American-designed Goudy Modern. An even more interesting choice was the font used for the large-scale letters that start the first word in every new chapter. These letters were made with Leviathan Capitals, which is a fitting, purposeful, and witty choice, as it references a biblical sea monster. Other physicalities of this version of Moby Dick worth noting are the lack of marginalia, bookplate, or any imprints from previous owners. This book has been extremely well kept over the years and feels almost brand new, which says a lot about this specific copy and its personal history. After further research and inquiry, there is no information in SDSU’s special collections about a previous owner or donor, adding an air of mystery and questions to this codex. Where did you come from? Who owned you? How did you get to this library? There are also no signatures for binding, and the binding was done with bright blue thread, signaling that even the thread color was a specific design choice. This codex contains 576 pages, ending with an epilogue and a colophon. To finish the book, you have to turn five more empty white pages to reach the end. When you reach the end, it is clear that the size, color choices, images, and textures added to the novel were purposeful and representative of its content. Digesting every design choice bound together argues that this fine press book was created for both enjoyment and aesthetic appreciation. This is an object to be desired, acquired, and collected; its large size not only represents the whale but also serves as a valuable commodity. 

This Arion Press limited edition of Moby Dick speaks about craftsmanship and a book’s value, as described in the Los Angeles Times interview with Andrew Hoyem, “Arion’s ‘Moby Dick’ was bound in Moroccan goatskin and enhanced with engravings by artist Barry Moser. Just 265 were printed. They were sold for $1,000 at the time. According to Biblio magazine, “Many authorities rank this edition of ‘Moby Dick’ as one of the two or three greatest American fine press books.” The fact that this once-failed book, met with immense critique and strife, was allowed to evolve into not only a success but a status symbol, reveals a lot about the value and reimagination of a book. These editions were bound in real animal skin, which gives this book an air of luxury, status, and value. Historically, books bound in goat skin were more expensive and sought after than books bound in common materials. This reflects the wealth and status of its owner, and encourages the object’s scarcity. In this limited edition, value is created from its materials, the human touch used to form it, the time it was published, and the amount sold. The scarce amount of 265 copies is a strategic choice that solidifies this item as rare and valuable. The $1000 price tag is the cherry on top, making this object a desired and special item, one that will become more expensive as the years go on as a collector’s item.

The history of the Arion Press and its catalogue of codices published speaks about their purpose and overall mission. As stated on the Arion Press website, “Fifty years ago, Andrew Hoyem officially founded Arion Press, establishing what would become one of the country’s last fine book printers. Since then, we have released 127 exquisitely handcrafted tomes—classic literature reimagined by contemporary artists, whose singular vision brings a new perspective to the text.” This quote reflects a half-century of devotion to the art of bookmaking and craftsmanship. Even in an era of digital media, Arion Press stands as a rare and significant testament to handcrafted codices, contemporary art, and the reimagination of perspectives. Arion Press continues to publish books and make a name for itself. In the span of one hundred and twenty-seven books published, Moby Dick falls as a fine press book number six, showing that it was published early in Arion Press’s career. Arion Press has also published its versions of classic texts such as The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald, Ulysses by James Joyce, and even The Holy Bible. These texts all have in common deep human significance and thought. This selection can be classified as their mission statement of bringing new perspectives to already written texts and marking themselves as part of important literary history.

There is something to be said about the history of limited-edition books and the lack of information surrounding it. Stated in The History of the Limited Editions Club. By Carol Porter Grossman, “The impact of the Limited Editions Club on bibliophile taste in the USA, Europe, and elsewhere was considerable, and yet no full-length study of its history and publications has appeared until now… The history of the Limited Editions Club is really that of two brilliant publishers, George Macy and Sid Shiff. The Club’s production falls into three periods as a result. Founded by Macy in 1929” (Grossman, pg 250–251). This study came out in 2017, truly showcasing how new and modern the study of book history is. It is to be noted that the emergence of limited edition books started in the 19th century as a response to mass-produced books and industrialization. There was a Private Press Movement in 1891, and then many adaptations of the houses that made limited editions, which followed after. Limited editions are important to our history because they mark a point in time when books became objects of art and craftsmanship instead of mere vessels of content. Additionally, this is when books became objects of collection and acquisition for a high price, thus creating books to be commodities instead of books as information vessels to be read.

The history of books as a whole and the communication circuit that takes books from writer to publisher to reader and everything in between tends not to count limited editions in their equations. As seen in, What is the History of Books by Robert Darnton, “Instead of dwelling on fine points of bibliography, they tried to uncover the general pattern of book production and consumption over long stretches of time. They compiled statistics from requests for privileges (a kind of copyright), analyzed the contents of private libraries, and traced ideological currents through neglected genres like the bibliothéque bleue (primitive paperbacks). Rare books and fine editions had no interest for them; they concentrated instead on the most ordinary sort of books, because they wanted to discover the literary experience of ordinary readers” (Darton, pg 66). This argues that limited editions are not ordinary books meant for ordinary readers. To push that notion further, the limited fine editions’ purpose isn’t even for reading. If an individual wanted to read Moby Dick, they could go to their local library or bookstore. These limited fine editions are created to be a valuable collector’s item, which don’t even need to be read to be enjoyed or used for their intended purpose. 

There is an argument to be made against the creation of limited-edition books, marking them as objects of prestige, intended for the elite. However, these Fine Press limited editions reveal more about craftsmanship and beauty than elitism, and their history makes that evident. As commented in The Tarlton Law Library, “The British fine presses of the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, including Kelmscott Press, Vale Press, Eragny Press, Ashendene Press, Doves Press, Essex House Press and Caradoc Press, embraced the return to craftsmanship that typified the Arts and Crafts movement. Their books were characterized by a combination of carefully chosen texts, high-quality materials, beautifully decorated pages, and equally exquisite bindings.” This passage reveals that fine press limited-edition presses originated as a response to the industrialization and mass production of books. Embracing the Arts and Crafts movement, these presses transformed the printed volume into deliberate works of art. These fine press books are about aesthetic beauty, historical significance, and creating a book that doesn’t need to be read to be enjoyed, admired, and treasured, redefining what a book can be. This then built a community among collectors and created historical objects to learn from and engage with. 

The intended purpose of collecting and owning limited-edition books has been the key to their survival, drawing people to them even in the digital age. Andrew Hoyem points out, “I believe Amazon and e-readers have no effect on our business. People who want Arion Press books want physical books and appreciate our books as works of art and craft. Looking at the larger picture, there is evidence that fatigue with reading on the screen drives the renewal of interest in the physical book.” This statement emphasizes the distinction between the business of limited-edition books and mass-produced codices. Fine press books are part of a specific market for individuals drawn to aesthetic and artful objects. These are meant to be admired and collected rather than exclusively read. Even in the digital age, these books will never go out of style. Their physical quality will always have a place in public and personal libraries. In an age where you can read anything on a device, people are drawn to physical codices, desiring the feel and admiring what is in their hands. What some people consider old news is somebody’s desire and a collector’s item. 

Although some individuals deem limited-edition fine press books as old news, that doesn’t discourage the Arion Press. In fact, they feel the opposite and that even more young people are embracing and craving physical codicies. Andrew Hoyem, in his 2015 interview remarks, “Younger people, tired of staring at screens, are becoming book collectors in increasing numbers.” This showcases that limited-edition books are speaking to young people because of the digital, not despite it. Reading on screens as the only way to get information is drawing young people to the ownership of codices. Owning a physical item is appealing when comparing the digital world to our physical world. In the digital age, we don’t own anything. We are renters, subscribers, or borrowers. At the end of the day, we dont possess the content the digital device provides us. We can’t feel it or touch it, let alone own it. This makes the ownership and collection of codices even more special and desirable in the world we live in today. It is seen in the way individuals collect CDs and records; they also collect books. Whether the intention is to read them or not. The desire stems from the beauty, artfulness, feel, and even smell these physical codices provide. In response to the world so quickly becoming digital, people are holding on to their physical items even tightly. In an age of limited ownership of the digital world, it pushes the urge to own and collect what you can in the physical world.

To conclude, Moby Dick was not always considered the influential and robust work that it is today. This publication underwent incredible scrutiny in its early days and was not met with immediate praise and popularity. Showcasing that a book’s power and its popularity are separate ideas. It took a new generation of scholars to appreciate its content, which pushed this work into pop culture. Doing so, society and culture transformed Moby Dick into many adaptations, films, children’s books, and limited editions, turning it into what they wanted it to be. This created many famous and significant codices that act as historical artifacts, including the 1979 Arion Press publication of Moby Dick by Herman Melville. Exploring this edition opened up the history of limited edition codices and information about presses such as the Arion Press. As a response to the Industrial Revolution and in alignment with the Arts and Crafts movement, a resurgence of handcrafted, limited edition codices made its mark as a significant symbol for artistry, craftsmanship, beauty, and the human touch, becoming valuable collector’s items and objects of ownership. In the digital age we live in today, people still find themselves drawn to and gravitate towards physical codices, showing that these objects will always have a place in our hearts. This argues that books are not just one thing; they possess many services and don’t even have to be read to be admired and enjoyed, pushing us to think about books differently. In a time when you can access almost anything on a digital device without ownership drives the value of a physical codex even further as an item you can feel, touch, and own. 

                                                 Works Cited:

Arion Press. Arion Press, www.arionpress.com  Accessed 12 Dec. 2025. 

Bruckner, D. J. R. “With Art and Craftsmanship, Books Regain Former Glory.” The New York Times Magazine, 28 Oct. 1984.

Bryant, John. “Moby‑Dick: History of a Loose‑Fish: Manuscript, Print and Culture.” Leviathan, vol. 3, no. 2, Oct. 2001, pp. 37–56. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Darnton, Robert. “What Is the History of Books?” Daedalus, vol. 111, no. 3, Summer 1982, pp. 65–83.

Duclos, Paul. “A Press Above the Rest.” Bay Crossings, Bay Crossings Staff Report, 1 Feb. 2015, https://www.baycrossings.com/a-press-above-the-rest/  Accessed 12 Dec. 2025.

Grossman, Carol Porter. The History of the Limited Editions Club. New Castle, Oak Knoll Press, 2017.

“Fine and Private Press.” Tarlton Law Library, The University of Texas at Austin, https://tarlton.law.utexas.edu/fine-and-private-press  Accessed 12 Dec. 2025.

“Review: Moby-Dick; or, The Whale, by Herman Melville.” Nineteenth-Century Literature, vol. 38, no. 2, 1983, p. 238. University of California Press. Accessed via UC Press Online.

What Haven’t I Learned?

I can’t help but feel overwhelmed having to write everything I have learned this semester in just one blog post. There is so much to discuss, I don’t even know where to start. This class was truly so unique in that it wasn’t just about books; it was also about the digital. It wasn’t just about the old, but was about the new. It was about so many elements that had to do with publishing, book binding, writing, reading, the past, and even the future. For a class about books, it wasn’t about reading but about the books themselves. Books are physical, cultural objects with a body you can read, not just storage containers for text. These objects are companions, part of collections, and commodities. Books are so many things all at once.

The idea of “bookishness” as a response to a culture in transition explains the phenomenon of book collectors and physical media collectors in the digital age. This class touched a lot on digital history and how quickly new technologies have changed our world. Amazon started as a bookstore, gained trust from the public, and became a place where you can buy anything. Just like how screens have interfaces, books contain interfaces too, which can be read and interpreted the same way texts can. These interfaces make you feel something, which causes the digital world to take inspiration from the book interface by making Kindle and laptop screens white with pages you can turn. Subtle things like having a “home” button and a background containing a sunny field create feelings of comfort, pushing a safe feeling when using these foreign devices.

Archives were also a big topic in this class, and how there are still so many unread stories in the archives all over the world. These historical papers are also looked through by people who either deem them important or unimportant, leading to the question: how does somebody get that much power to shape our history?

In all, I could go on and on about everything I’ve learned in this class and how I am a much better person for it. Just like how books are not one thing, this class is not one thing. This class was about culture, society, and history. To look at the future, you must look at the past, and that is exactly what we did. We saw how the new was inspired by the old, and that we wouldn’t have any new without the old. This was a media studies class, a book binding class, and an archives class all in one. The information I have learned in this class has reshaped how I view media and history. I am leaving this class changed and inspired. Thank you.

Battle of the Bands SDSU!!

Hey guys! I wanted to announce that my band, Girls Got Nerve, will be competing in this year’s SDSU Battle of the Bands for the chance to perform at Greenfest as an opener at the California Coast Open Air Theatre, which is located here on campus. Seven bands will be competing on December 3rd from 6-8:30 at the student union in the Montezuma Hall (where orientations are held for students). It’s gonna be a cool way for you guys to see some SDSU bands and get introduced to new music! I hope to see some of you guys there!:)

Here I have attached a pic of us wearing handcrafted outfits made by our guitarist, Toula.

Zine Workshop -Extra Credit-

I’m so happy that I attended the Zine workshop hosted by Vide. He did a great job bringing people together in a purposeful way to spread his knowledge on making zines and memes. I had a great time sitting with fellow students, crafting together in a collaborative environment. We would ask each other for opinions and share crafting materials. Although im not necessarily a crafty person, it was so cool to go through magazines and newspapers, collecting what I thought would serve me in my zine. I learned that zines are excellent ways to share information and spread messages. They are a form of storytelling and learning how to fold paper to make a book, connected to our class. I ended up making a goofy little book about my best friend/bandmate, and I gave it to her as a silly gift. Thank you, Vide, for putting on a cool event and bringing people together!

The Thrill of Owning

The idea of collecting books in a personal library without reading them, just for the thrill of having it, paints books in a new light as objects instead of content to be read. According to Walter Benjamin in his book Illuminations it’s not about the books at all, it is about the thrill of acquiring them and the feeling of owning them. It always comes down to ownership and power. People feel powerful and more intelligent if they have many books in their possession. It’s the feeling of looking around in your gallery knowing that they are all yours even though most of the books sit unread, for example, “to quote the answer which Anatole France gave to philistine who admired his library and then finished with the standard question, ‘And you have read all these books, Monsieur France?’ “Not one tenth of them. I don’t suppose you use your Sévres china everyday?(Benjamin, 62)” This quote places books in the same category as fancy china that sits in a cabinet, only to be used for special occasions, or never at all. This is powerful because it argues that books are merely material objects to be collected. This deeply corresponds with the idea of bookishness and shows books to be material items, separating them from what they hold inside.
I remember the first day of class many classmates spoke of their book collections and how they hadn’t even read most of them, and I related to that. We collect books for the feel, smell, touch, look, and physicality. The thrill of acquiring. The feeling of power from owning them. This is all very human of us, our hunting and gathering nature. I strongly believe humans will never stop collecting books, even in a fully digital age. Books will always be a collectors item, an object, separate from its content. Humans love books as objects, even if we don’t even use them to get our knowledge. 

Final Project Proposal

Moby Dick by Herman Melville is a foundational work of the American canon that has been read, reread, and taught for decades now. It is a timeless narrative that explores transcendentalism, class, power, religion, and the natural world while also questioning what it means to be educated, American, and even human. Most importantly, it’s a text about the art of reading, how to read, and the process of reading the world around you. Ishmael models this form of reading throughout the novel, not only by observing people and animals, but also by treating the world itself as a text, reading the markings on Queequeg’s body and the engravings on the whale’s back. Thus insinuating that books are not the only way to read and learn, and that knowledge comes in many forms. 

This led me to question: Does form affect content? Or, in other words, does the medium through which information is delivered shape the way we comprehend and emotionally engage with it? In this scholarly analysis, I will be interrogating different textual media of the same novel, Moby Dick, to examine their scale, interface, design choices, and how these all work together to tell their own story. To do this, I will be investigating a limited edition Arion Press artist book, a classic codex, and a PDF online version, exploring how these adaptations affect my reading experience, emotional response, and absorption of the text.

Bookishness – A Responce to a Culture in Transition.

Wow, I thoroughly enjoyed reading the first chapter of Jessica Pressman’s book Bookishness. I loved the words and all the wonderful pictures added for our viewing pleasure. It really helped to paint the picture of what bookishness truly is, a phenomenon of people fetishizing the look, feel, and idea of a book in the digital age, where we don’t need them anymore. Although the need might be gone, the want is still apparent. I loved how Pressman italicized these two words: Need and want. We dont need books anymore in our day-to-day lives, and this drastic change is what led to our even stronger want, desire, and fetishization for them.

It reminds me of why I love collecting CDs. I absolutely do not need my collection of CDs; I don’t even have a CD player in my car, and I can listen to all the same things on my iPhone, but it’s the physicality and the fetish of it. It feels more human to put in a CD or read a physical book.

These acts of going out of our way to use physical items such as books and CDs instead of relying on the digital feels nostalgic, and almost like a coping mechanism for how quickly our world became so digital. Pressman words it the best by saying, “Bookishness signals a culture in transition but also provides a solution to a dilemma of the contemporary literary age: how to maintain a commitment to the nearness, attachment, and affiliation that the book traditionally represented now that the use value of the book has so radically altered.” This quote is so verdant and robust with great language, such as the words; transition and radically altered. It honestly blew my mind reading this. That bookishness, in a way, acts as a response to a culture in transition, and this is so because the changes to the book have been so radically altered. Less than twenty years ago, books were the only means to read stories and novels. The first Amazon Kindle didn’t come out until 2007. Computers didn’t become necessary for school and home life until the 90’s and early 2000s. This all proves how shocking and quick our transition from physical to digital truly was, and we’re all still in shock and attempting to adjust. Bookishness is also, in a way, a fight and push back against the digital, our response to the attempted deletion of our beloved physical items. In all, I resonate with the term bookishness, and I will continue to be bookish as a way to push back against a fully digital age.

Archives… Who Decides What is Importaint?

Before taking this class, I never considered how we take in and shape history. I now know this is all done through the collection, discovery, and donation of archives. However, if a scholar goes into collecting and writing about archives with a bias… this can become slippery territory. This leads me to question, who are these people, and why do they obtain so much power? They have the power in their hands to shape history and even, in some cases, dispose of it.

According to Katherine Bode and Roger Osborne, “Book history from the archival record” in The Cambridge Companion to the History of the Book, “The records that are retained or donated might reflect a hagiographical impulse or the sentimental feelings of an individual. When records are donated and transferred to a formal archive- whether a library, museum, public record office, or university- other processes will further shape the archive through selection and disposal of records, according to the archivists’ methods of valuation. (page, 224″)” This quote demonstrates that some personal feelings and biases shape the process an archive goes through. They can be either deemed important or unimportant and shoved away in a folder that may never be acknowledged. This reminds me of when we were in special collections, and Anna mentioned how much is stored in the SDSU archival collections that have never been touched or read before. This illustrates that there is so much untouched archival history that might have been deemed insignificant by somebody’s biases.

This perfectly aligns with a quote from the shadows archives excerpt, “Given the lack of institutions dedicated to the black experience, the novel became an alternative site of historical preservation, a means to ensure both individual legacy and group survival.” This quote reveals that because of the lack of dedication to the history of the black experience, archives were sitting in these institutions, waiting to be examined. This leads me to question the history we are taught in school and all the facts we do know. How many minority voices have been disposed of over all of these years? Who has the power to deem an archive important or unimportant? I look forward to learning more in our classes this week.

The 1979 Publication of Moby Dick is Not a Novel but an Art Piece

PART 1: Biography of the physical descriptions of the book: Material

When you wander into the world that is the 1979 publication of Moby Dick by Herman Melville, you will first see a blue glossy cover representing the blue ocean with wave-like texture, similar to the waves that would have washed over the Pequod. On the spine, you will see Melville’s MOBY DICK Arion Press engraved on it, and when you finally open the book, you will see that the first page is a white blank page, thus representing the vast nothingness of the ocean and the whiteness of the whale. You can see it is one piece of paper, thus insinuating that this book is a folio.

You then turn through five blank white pages (showcasing the abundance of paper available in the late 1970s) before reaching the title page, which features a woodcut-stamped portrait of Herman Melville, his name, and the title printed in blue: MOBY DICK; or, The Whale and THE ARION PRESS: San Francisco, 1979. This book functions as both a reader response and a memorial, as the second page reads, “In token of my admiration for his genius, this book is inscribed to Nathaniel Hawthorne,” Melville’s pen pal for two years. Turning the next few pages, labeled iv–vii, you find the table of contents in Roman type, followed by a map of the world marking major whaling grounds and the inferred track of the Pequod. Finally, you arrive at the opening line of this great American novel, where the first word of the sentence appears large and blue, symbolizing the vast blue ocean and suggesting that, just as one can lose themselves at sea, one can also become immersed in the words on the page.

This fine press book was created for both enjoyment and aesthetic appreciation, and its large size not only represents the whale but also serves as a status symbol. I hypothesize that it would have been kept in a private library or displayed prominently by a Moby Dick enthusiast. Its thick, textured pages reveal slight lines and traces of acidity, and if you look closely under the light, you can see a whale-shaped watermark. Additionally, the pages are torn, serrated, and raw, suggesting that the entire sheet was used and intentionally left untrimmed.

The excess space on the page can be compared to the blubber of a whale and even to a picture frame, displaying the words on the page as art, not just content to be read, which is very fitting because this book is classified as an art book. The beautiful images were created from relief printing, specifically, woodcut stamps, and these scattered images are undeniably eye-catching. They help reframe and visualize the story and even create a new way to interpret the age-old tale that is Moby Dick.

My last comments about the physicality of this version of Moby Dick are that there is no marginalia, bookplate, or any imprints made by previous owners. This book has been extremely well kept over the years, and it feels almost brand new. There are also no signatures for binding, and the book was bound with blue thread. This beautiful codex contains 576 pages, ending with an epilogue and a colophon. To finish the book, you have to turn five more empty white pages to reach the end. When you reach the end, it is clear that the size, color choices, images, and textures added to the novel were purposeful and representative of its content. 

PART 2 ​​Scholarly Analysis: The aspect of this book that not only tremendously stood out to me but singlehandedly led me to choose it was the book’s size and the white space surrounding the text on the page. I found this to be incredibly interesting because I have read and studied Moby Dick before, in a small codex form, and bringing that experience with me when viewing the 1979 Arion Press publication opened my eyes to the fact that the two forms led to two completely different ways of reading the same story. This then led me to the idea that the excess white and vast space surrounding the words on the pages of the 1979 Arion Press publication of Herman Melville’s novel Moby Dick was a thoughtful and purposeful act made by its creator to reframe the words of Moby Dick and alter the way we interpret the novel. The design choice acts as a reader response which presents the novel in a new light as not just literature but a peice of art, which, instead of being viewed independently, can be viewed with multiple people. This prompts a reevaluation of how we read the “great American novel,” demonstrating that form profoundly shapes our experience of content.

The first copy of Moby Dick by Herman Melville was published in 1851, bound in the standard codex form that made the book remarkably accessible and portable, allowing readers to carry it anywhere they wished to go. This condensed, compact format creates an intimate reading experience, making you feel as though you are confined aboard the Pequod alongside Ishmael, a sensation that deeply shapes how the story is read. The words are smaller and closer together, and the margins are minimal. This small codex was designed for independent, personal reading, something you wouldn’t necessarily share with another person.

In contrast, the 1979 Arion Press publication of Moby Dick invites a very different kind of engagement. When opening its vast white pages and bold blue cover, you feel as though you are stepping into a museum or art gallery. You are no longer reading Moby Dick privately but viewing it through an artful lens, perhaps alongside someone else, much like how large art installations are experienced by multiple viewers at once. This edition’s scale transforms the act of reading into a shared, visual experience.

This codex’s considerable size, extravagant images, and vast margins allow the reader’s eyes to drift leisurely across each page, transforming the act of reading into a visual experience. In contrast, most novels, especially small, portable codices, are not designed to be visual experiences, which is one reason this version is so unique. The large format alters our perception; it doesn’t simply feel like reading an ordinary book but rather like viewing a luxurious art piece. The five pages that open and close the novel can be compared to walking through a hallway before entering a museum or art gallery. To create separation, some museums use clean white walls between each artwork, and these pages evoke that same sense of quiet transition.

This adaptation of Moby Dick should not be viewed simply as a novel but as an art piece. The way it is framed mirrors that of a traditional artwork, largely due to the use of a white background. Placing artwork within a frame with a white mat serves not only to protect the piece but also to enhance its visual impact. This framing creates space and separation, offering a distraction-free way for viewers to focus on what is most important. Similarly, the white space surrounding the words and illustrations in the 1979 Arion Press publication of Moby Dick serves the same purpose: to draw our eyes to the art on the page. In this way, the design itself reinforces the argument that this adaptation of Moby Dick is not merely a novel, but a work of art.

This form of Moby Dick and its deliberate use of paper and space on each page was a purposeful choice made by its creator. I believe this book came to exist because someone was profoundly transformed by the “great American novel” and felt inspired to craft their own adaptation. The story of Moby Dick itself is deeply concerned with reading, education, power, and how we interpret the world around us. As a result, this work of literature has sparked countless reader responses due to its enlightening and life-changing nature. I think someone was so moved by the novel’s content that they felt compelled to create a new version, one that highlights how artful the text truly is. The novel’s interpretive nature invites endless hypotheses about its meaning, much like a work of art.

In all, this adaptation of Moby Dick’s large form changes the way we read and interpret the novel. With the white framing space encircling the words and pictures on the page, we are pushed to view this codex as art, not a novel. Traditionally, novels are typically small and bound in a way that makes it easy to take from one place to the next. This codex, in comparison, is big and heavy and would be very hard to lug around with you all day. This wouldn’t be a book read on the train on the way to work or shoved in a purse or bag. This codex would be stored in a library or on display, in the same way that art pieces are set on display. This codex was created as a reader response. Somebody wanted to reframe this novel as art and change where we read it and how we read it. We no longer have to imagine what the world of Moby Dick would have looked like because it is framed for us with pictures on the page. Moby Dick also becomes a shared experience, its grand scale allowing multiple people to view and engage with it at once. Altogether, this demonstrates how form transforms the way we absorb content, the spaces in which we read, and the people we read with.

Digital Literature’s Short Shelf Life

Digital literature, hypertext, hyperlinks, and electronic literature are all extreamly new terms in my vocabulary. I have never thought about literature made on the computer made for reading on the computer. This is partly because I am incredibly digitally illiterate and try to focus more on physical books that I can feel and touch. However, stepping into this digital world of literature is more fascinating than I ever thought it could be. It is experimental and fresh, taking from the past and making it into the new. As seen in the text, Electronic Literature, “We encounter electronic literature as both a reading experience and an application, an artifact that may also encompass the tool used to produce it. (page, 173)” This short quote articulates that form and media directly affect the form and content. This then affects how a person will read it and how long it stays relevant in our ever-changing world. There are also connections to be made about how media forms from the past affect the media forms we practice and consume today. The past and present are constantly in communication; in the same way, there is always a feedback loop between the arts. I am learning that it is very important to understand this when studying literature and its history. Especially, if you are doing research in media archeology, looking at artifacts and archives. This quote directly speaks to this, touching on the fact that an artifact will encompass the tool used to produce it. Therefore, writing something on a typewriter will create a different product than writing on the computer or by hand. Also, the affordability of paper will influence how long something may be or if it is lengthy or condensed. The main idea here is that it is impossible to ignore the form used to produce media. We live in a purposeful, obsolete culture where media dies. This is why digital literature will have a very short shelf life. This literature is hard to archive; software is always adapting and changing. In contrast to a book, which takes a physical form and can be preserved and kept safe from damage. Anything digital is not safe and is susceptible to deletion. This is all so fascinating, and I am so excited to be learning this, especially since we live in such a digital age, and im trying to be less digitally illiterate.