For the final I have decided to circle back to my midterm, on the book from special collections- De Magorum Daemonomania. De Magorum Daemonomania uses its material and visual technologies– its blackletter typeface and authoritative printing style– to demonstrate a false sense of credibility and institutional authority.
This time I want to focus more heavily on the work as a media object rather than its text itself. The book’s typography and format creates this false illusion of legal structure, legal scholarship, and legal format. I am going to bring in these points from my midterm, but expand on them with outside sources, with a focus specifically on the authority of the typeface and how it shaped how De Magorum Daemonomania was read and interpreted. This aspect of legal formatting functions as a tool of persuasion that is aimed at legal scholars and people with positions of power, in order to prosecute feared witches and demons of the time this was published. The authoritative formatting of this book changes the tone of the text, as well as who was most likely reading this book. In this sense, De Magorum Daemonomania exemplifies how early modern print culture could manufacture cultural belief—and cultural fear—through design. Design is more important than we think, and De Magorum Daemonomania does a good job demonstrating this. I also am going to bring in some outside sources that analyze ideas of witchcraft in early European times, as well as works that analyze the significance of typeface. Both of these factors also affect the interpretation of the book and how those in early Europe were reading. Borsuk’s The Book will also bring in aspects to support my thesis and claim, touching on the history of typeface and typography. I am excited to expand on my midterm, as I was very intrigue about the history of this book and the history of typography.
Bibliography
Anna Borsuk- The Book
https://archive.org/details/thinkingwithdemo0000clar/page/n1/mode/2up