The Book

When reading chapter one of The Book, I was intrigued by the history of how the book has evolved as an object. From rock, to clay, to the papyrus scroll, etc- the book has changed forms so many times throughout our history. I knew that paper and the book evolved, but I had not realized how or why these technologies were created. To record history yes, but more importantly it seemed writing and reading was a big way to show off your education or high status in society. On page 15 of The Book it says “Unlike today’s libraries, the collection was developed not as a public good, but as a symbol of King Ashurbanpal’s stature and scholarly achievement. Evidence suggests the library was also consulted by priests, professionals, and members of the learned class- some tablets are inscribed with threats to would-be thieves demanding borrowed tablets be returned the same day.” This quote stood out to me because of the discussion of status and education like I mentioned earlier, but also the discussion of libraries. We talked in class today about how libraries have changed and what a library is has changed. The SDSU library (shoutout Trinity who mentioned this) has no books. It does, but you don’t see them unless you are searching for them. When I think of a library I have always thought about it as a home for books, or a quiet place where you go to check out a book. Now a library, like the Love library, is a place to study, chat, eat, and sit. Old libraries were used for the educated and the wealthy, not for the public, which is such a weird concept to think about because to me the library is the most public shared space I can think of. Books are meant to be shared and discussed, they are not meant to sit on shelves unread. I go to the library everyday of the week to do my school work, but in my four years of being here I have never checked out a book- I do that at the bookstore, where you pay for the book. In high school the library is how I always thought it was- a quiet place to rent out/read books, college libraries are very different. I am not sure when this changed or why, or maybe they were always like this. But until the discussion we had today I had never even thought about this fact. The library of my youth is drastically different from the library of my now. I guess this is like the book itself as an object, the library a place that used to hold them, that has changed as well after time. Now I am more motivated to actually check out a book here at SDSU and check out the stacks, but before this class I have never done so in my college experience. I can’t even remember the last time I went to an actual library with books. 

2 thoughts on “The Book

  1. Nice reflection about the state of the “Library” in today’s world. I too share a similar sentiment when it comes to the libraries of then compared to the libraries of now. Libraries felt a lot more important back then or rather, meaningful. Today, you can get a book on your phone or even choose to get it and have it read to you. When I was younger i do remember the sole purpose of me going to the library was for a book. Now i go there to simply study. The discussion on Thursday really put things into perspective for me as well, about how with cultural and technological shifts and advancement, things and places no longer made important slowly begin to fade or completely chand take on a whole new meaning.

  2. I too appreciate your reflection. And I am glad that you are starting to see books and reading spaces differently. I would like to push you on this: “Books are meant to be shared and discussed, they are not meant to sit on shelves unread.” How are books meant to be anything? Can you say more? Eager to hear more from you now and throughout the semester.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *