Week 5: Book as Content and Commodity

In Chapter 1, “The Book as Content”, in Amaranth Borsuk’s, The Book, Borsuk walks us through our changing perception of books as content rather than object. Borsuk explains that, “we might generalize the historic moment at which the printed text arises as one of increasing intimacy between individuals and texts, which accounts, in part, for the form of the book as we know it today” (Borsuk, 83). The book, in the form we know it today, reflects the shift of books becoming not only a more intimate experience between book and reader, but also evolving around the needs of the reader. Instead of simply consuming information, actively engaging with the text, a “dialectical relationship” between reader and author became valued. 

This shift in perception allowed for books to become commodities. Borsuk explains that, “these reader-focused elements were just as important to marketing as to book use. They mark the codex as a commodity” (Borsuk, 88). “Authors and publishers activity courted this kind of dialectical relationship”, and began to consider not just the information books contained, but also how the physical design appealed to buyers. Features that we see today like open margins left space for and encouraged “active annotation–a visible and tactile engagement of mind with page”, making books more interactive and personal, and in turn increased desirability and market value (Borsuk, 89). As the needs of the reader changed, the form of the book did as well. The printing press allowed for books to be standardized, mass produced, and more accessible for a widening audience of readers. However, this also made books products to be designed and sold, rather than rare, sacred objects only found in monasteries and universities. The new commercialized market for books, shaped by consumer demand “played a key role in the commodification of the book and in our changing perception of it as content rather than object” (Borsuk, 109). 

2 thoughts on “Week 5: Book as Content and Commodity

  1. Great post, as you are starting to see and identify a feedback loop between technology and culture, between book as object and reading practices, even content. Keep going with these ideas, as they will be the foundation for all of our learning this semester.

  2. Hi Myles, I liked your post a lot. I completely agree with your thought process that “As the needs of the reader changed, the form of the book did as well.” I felt that the chapter really drove the point that the book becoming commodified altered the way it was used and the way that people saw the item. The shift from religious, sacred, or lawful texts to a personal item that was able to be cherished or used as a tool led to the major difference in content. It definitely changed what books were capable of containing to those who were able to read. Nice job!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *